California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 2366: Administrative Procedure Act: proposed regulations: cost-of-living impact on residents of the state.
In committee Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 2366 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 19, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Administrative Procedure Act: proposed regulations: cost-of-living impact on residents of the state. Primary sponsor: Anamarie Ávila Farías (D). It lists 3 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (May 14, 2026): In committee: Held under submission.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. The act requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal any administrative regulation to assess the potential for adverse economic impact on California business enterprises and individuals and requires the state agency to adhere to specified requirements in making that assessment.
This bill would include among those requirements for assessing the potential for adverse economic impact the consideration of the proposal’s cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, as defined.
Existing law requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation that is not a major regulation to prepare an economic impact assessment that includes to what extent the regulation will affects specified factors, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state. Existing law requires a state agency proposing to adopt, amend, or repeal a major regulation to prepare a standardized regulatory impact analysis that addresses specified factors, including the creation or elimination of jobs within the state.
This bill would also require the assessment for nonmajor regulations to include to what extent it will affect the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, and would require the standardized regulatory impact analysis for major regulations to address the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state. The bill would require an agency to notify the office when the agency determines it needs to contract for outside services to perform the analyses and would require the office to select the contractor and oversee its work. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to adopt a standardized cost-of-living methodology for use by all agencies that includes a process for determining whether those cost-of-living impacts are significant. The bill would require each state agency to submit the standardized regulatory impact analysis to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, and would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office to take certain actions, including conducting an independent analysis of the adequacy of an agency’s economic analysis and an analysis of the cost-of-living impacts on residents of the state, and to provide its analysis to the state agency.
This bill would require the Department of Finance to develop and maintain a regulatory economic burden tracker that will gather and analyze the cumulative economic burden of regulations by sector of the economy. The bill would require the department to post the tracker on its internet website and update the tracker annually.
Existing law requires the notice of proposed adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation to include, among other information, a statement of the results of the economic impact assessment and a summary of any comments submitted to the agency.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 3 · Republican 1
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anamarie Ávila Farías | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 15 |
| Blanca Pacheco | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 64 |
| Darshana R. Patel | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 76 |
| Greg Wallis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 47 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- In committee: Held under submission.
- In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
- Coauthors revised.
- From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
- Coauthors revised.
- Referred to Coms. on E.D., G., & H.I. and JUD.
- From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
- Read first time. To print.