Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 2238: Mobilehome Residency Law: civil action: physical improvements.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 2238 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 19, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Mobilehome Residency Law: civil action: physical improvements. Primary sponsor: Blanca Rubio (D). It lists 5 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 29, 2026): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, prescribes various terms and conditions of tenancies in mobilehome parks. Existing law prohibits an action based upon the management’s alleged failure to maintain the physical improvement in the common facilities in good working order or condition or alleged reduction of service from being commenced by a homeowner unless the management has been given at least 30 days’ prior notice of the intention to commence the action.

This bill would authorize management to move to dismiss with prejudice a claim that alleges a failure to maintain, or a reduction of service regarding, a physical improvement, as described above, if that physical improvement is not actually present within the mobilehome park, nor provided or under the control of the park owner or manager. The bill would, upon petition by the management, require a court that grants a motion to dismiss for this reason to award the management reasonable attorney’s fees and impose a civil penalty and other sanctions to be paid by the attorney filing the action, as specified.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 3 · Republican 3

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Blanca RubioPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly48
Rosilicie Ochoa BoghCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate19
Timothy GraysonCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate9
Shannon GroveCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate12
Alexandra MacedoCo-sponsorRepublicanAssembly33
Michelle RodriguezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly53

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  3. Referred to Com. on JUD.
  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 0. Page 4912.)
  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 28).
  9. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
  10. Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
  12. Read first time. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page