AB 2042: Civil actions: setting aside default or default judgment.

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

(1)Existing law permits a defendant in a debt enforcement action, brought by a buyer of consumer debt who has obtained a default or default judgment against the defendant, to file a motion to set aside the default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action if the defendant did not receive actual notice of the action in time to defend against it. Existing law requires such a motion to be filed within 6 years after entry of the default or default judgment or 180 days after the first actual notice of the action, or, in the case of identity theft or mistaken identity, within a reasonable amount of time but in no case later than 180 days after the first actual notice of the action.

This bill would clarify that a defendant who did not receive actual notice may file a motion to set aside and for leave to defend even if the service of the summons of the action was lawfully effected.

(2)Existing law provides that if a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served, the summons may be served by leaving a copy at the person’s dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address, in the presence of a person who is at least 18 years of age, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint as specified. Existing law also authorizes a summons in an action for unlawful detainer to be served by posting if the court is satisfied that the party to be served cannot with reasonable diligence be served in any authorized manner other than publication, and that other specified conditions are met. Existing law requires the proof of service of a summons to contain specified information and documentation. Beginning on January 1, 2027, existing law will define reasonable “diligence,” for purposes of service of process in specified civil cases, to mean attempting personal delivery of the summons and complaint, in good faith, on at least three occasions on three different days at three different times. Beginning on January 1, 2027, existing law will require the proof of service of a summons and complaint, if served personally, by substituted service, or by posting, if the summons is for an action for unlawful detainer of real property, to include at least one photograph, if such can be obtained without compromising the safety of the process server, of the site of the effectuated or attempted service and contain a readable stamp and global positioning system (GPS) coordinates indicating the date, time, and location of service. Beginning on January 1, 2027, existing law will also require a process server to provide a detailed statement on the proof of service, as specified, if there is no GPS or cellular signal available at the time and place of the effected or attempted service.

This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to this provision.

(3)Existing law prescribes methods for the service of a summons in a civil action. Under existing law, a party that was not served in accordance with those methods may file a motion to set aside or vacate a default or default judgment and for leave to defend the action or move for dismissal. The party making such a motion is required to proffer evidence that service was not lawfully effected. This proffer rebuts the presumption of facts stated in the process server’s return and place the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that service of the summons and complaint was lawful on the party seeking the default or default judgment. Existing law makes these provisions operative on January 1, 2027.

This bill would clarify that the provisions described above apply to service attempted or completed on or after January 1, 2027, and that those provisions do not alter a court’s existing authority to determine a motion for relief from a judgment that involves a proof of service filed before January 1, 2027. The bill would also clarify that a party who is not served may move for dismissal as permitted by existing law.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

1. September 20, 2026Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 379, Statutes of 2026.
2. September 20, 2026Approved by the Governor.
3. August 24, 2026Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
4. August 17, 2026Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 6200.).
5. July 2, 2026In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
6. July 2, 2026Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5188.).
7. June 25, 2026Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
8. June 24, 2026From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 23).
9. June 10, 2026From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
10. June 5, 2026In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
11. May 13, 2026Referred to Com. on JUD.
12. May 5, 2026In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.