Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1955: Crimes: firearm enhancements.

In committee Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1955 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 13, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Crimes: firearm enhancements. Primary sponsor: Juan Alanis (R). Most recent recorded action (March 18, 2026): In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Under existing law, anyone who personally uses a firearm in the commission of a specified felony offense shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years, or by 20 years if they discharge the firearm, or by imprisonment for 25 years to life if they discharge the firearm and proximately causes great bodily harm. Existing law prohibits the application of these firearm enhancements to the lawful use or discharge of a firearm by a peace officer, under specified circumstances, or by any person in lawful self-defense, lawful defense of another, or lawful defense of property.

This bill would, notwithstanding the exemption above, prohibit the application of these firearm enhancements to a peace officer, as defined, unless the use or discharge of the firearm did not arise out of and was not in the course of employment. The bill would place the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence on the prosecution that the firearm enhancements apply to a peace officer. The bill would define “arise out of and in the course of employment” for these purposes. By placing the burden of proof on, and thus imposing a new duty on, local prosecutors, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Juan AlanisPrimary sponsorRepublicanAssembly22

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  2. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  3. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
  5. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
  6. From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
  7. Read first time. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page