AB 194: Transportation.

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, until September 1, 2031, requires the State Air Resources Board, with funds provided in the Budget Act of 2026, to establish a new zero-emission electric vehicle incentive program for first-time zero-emission vehicle buyers and, as part of that program, to enter into grant agreements with light-duty passenger vehicle original engine manufacturers to provide incentives for consumers for the purchase or lease of new, and the purchase of used, light-duty passenger electric vehicles at the point of sale and registered to California residents.

This bill would make a nonsubstantive correction to these provisions.

Existing law grants the legislative body of a city certain powers with respect to city streets and roads.

This bill would prohibit a city with a population of 2,000,000 or more from reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes on a street that provides the only access to 2 or more adjacent cemeteries without prior approval of the governing body and the concurrence of the mayor of the city. The bill would require the governing body of the city, prior to approval of a vehicle travel lane reduction, as described above, to conduct a duly noticed public hearing regarding the proposed vehicle travel lane reduction, and make particular written findings, as specified.

Under existing law, the Department of the California Highway Patrol is responsible for enforcement of all laws regulating the operation of vehicles and use of the highways, as specified. Existing law authorizes the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol to provide for the physical security of any current or former constitutional officer or legislator of the state.

This bill would expand that authorization to include the immediate family, as defined, of a current or former constitutional officer or legislator. The bill would require the commissioner to assess the threat level to determine the threat level and duration of physical security provided and would require that the threat level be reassessed after 6 months. The bill would prohibit the commissioner from altering the level or duration of the security provided until that reassessment was completed.

Sponsors

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

1. August 31, 2026Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2. August 31, 2026From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (August 31).
3. August 28, 2026From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F. R.
4. April 2, 2025Referred to Com. on B. & F. R.
5. March 20, 2025In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
6. March 20, 2025Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 760.)
7. March 18, 2025Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
8. March 17, 2025(Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 643.)
9. March 17, 2025Ordered to second reading.
10. March 17, 2025Withdrawn from committee.
11. February 3, 2025Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
12. January 9, 2025From printer. May be heard in committee February 8.