Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1795: Smoke Damage Recovery Act.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1795 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 10, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Smoke Damage Recovery Act. Primary sponsor: Mike Gipson (D). Most recent recorded action (September 15, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 240, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

(1)Existing law generally regulates classes of insurance, including fire and residential property insurance. Existing law specifies the measure of indemnity under an open fire insurance policy that requires payment of actual cash value or replacement cost. If there is a covered loss relating to a state of emergency, existing law requires additional living expense coverage to be for a period of no less than 24 months from the inception of the loss.

This bill, the Smoke Damage Recovery Act, would create a rebuttable presumption that if wildfire smoke, ash, soot, char, or combustion byproducts are present in a surviving residential property in the wildfire impact zone after a wildfire, then smoke damage in the property is the result of that wildfire. The bill would prohibit an insurer from terminating additional living expenses coverage for a residential property insurance smoke damage claim for a property within the wildfire impact zone until the property has been restored to preloss condition and cleared for human occupancy, as specified. The bill would require specified regulations and guidance to apply to these claims within the wildfire impact zone. The bill would make an insurer responsible for the cost of sampling and testing that is necessary to restore a damaged property to its preloss condition and render it cleared for human occupancy. If a residential property has been cleared for human occupancy, the bill would require a claim for recontamination to be considered a new claim. The bill would require an insurer that chooses to exercise its right to inspect a smoke-damaged property to inspect the property as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 calendar days after receiving notice of the claim or, if applicable, no later than 30 calendar days after access to the property is granted. The bill would require the insurer to pay the actual cash value of the cost to restore the damaged personal property to its preloss condition no later than 30 calendar days after the inspection, unless the policyholder has agreed to restoration by the insurer. For damaged residential property, the bill would also require the insurer to pay the undisputed amount of replacement cost, up to the applicable policy limits, within 30 calendar days from the date the restoration is completed, unless the policyholder has agreed to restoration by the insurer. For a portion of a smoke damage claim pertaining to the replacement of covered personal property, the bill would require the insurer to pay the undisputed amount of the replacement cost of the personal property within 30 days from the date the insurer was provided with a receipt for purchase of the replaced personal property.

This bill would require the Department of Insurance, in coordination with others, to conduct a study on or before July 1, 2027, that, among other things, identifies the gaps in insurance coverage exposed by the Lineage Logistics (Lineage) warehouse fire in the Boyle Heights community in the City of Los Angeles, which broke out on June 17, 2026, including additional living expense coverage and business interruption coverage in the absence of a mandatory evacuation order triggering the coverage. The bill would require the department, on or before December 1, 2027, to submit a final written report detailing the findings and recommendations of the study to the Governor and Legislature, and would require the study to be posted on the department’s public internet website.

(2)Existing law, the Insurance Adjuster Act, generally regulates the licensing of insurance adjusters. Existing law, the Public Insurance Adjusters Act, generally regulates the licensing of insurance adjusters. The acts set forth various requirements with respect to operation as an insurance adjuster or public insurance adjuster.

This bill would require the Department of Insurance to develop training and certification programs for insurance adjusters and public insurance adjusters in inspecting, evaluating, sampling, or testing smoke damage caused by a wildfire involving residential properties. The bill would require an insurer, adjuster firm, or qualified manager to train and accredit its adjusters in accordance with specified regulations and guidance, and would require a public insurance adjuster hired by an insured to adjust smoke damage claims to have the requisite license, training, and certification.

(3)Existing law establishes the Division of Occupational Safety and Health and the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board within the Department of Industrial Relations and sets forth their powers and duties relating to the adoption of health and safety standards for workers.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Mike GipsonPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly65

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 240, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.
  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 58. Noes 7. Page 7055.).
  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 7055.)
  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 28. Noes 10.).
  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 13).
  12. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page