Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1744: Environmental advertising: sunscreen.

Enacted Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1744 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 5, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Environmental advertising: sunscreen. Primary sponsor: Dawn Addis (D), Gregg Hart (D). Most recent recorded action (September 18, 2026): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 272, Statutes of 2026.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Under existing law, it is unlawful for any person to make any untruthful, deceptive, or misleading environmental marketing claim, whether explicit or implied. A violation of this requirement is a misdemeanor.

This bill would make it unlawful for a person to represent in advertising or on the label or container of any sunscreen product, as specified, sold in the state, that the product is “reef safe,” “reef friendly,” “ocean safe,” “marine safe,” “ocean friendly,” “marine conscious,” “reef conscious,” or a similar term or phrase likely to cause a reasonable consumer to believe that the product does not harm marine ecosystems unless the product is free of chemical ultraviolet filters, as specified. A violation of the bill would be a misdemeanor. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 2

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Dawn AddisPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly30
Gregg HartPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly37

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 272, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 272, Statutes of 2026.
  3. Approved by the Governor.
  4. Approved by the Governor.
  5. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  6. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  7. In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
  8. In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 5583.).
  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page