Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1722: California Endangered Species Act: take prohibition: self-defense.

Vetoed Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Vetoed

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1722 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 5, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: California Endangered Species Act: take prohibition: self-defense. Primary sponsor: Heather Hadwick (R). It lists 3 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (September 18, 2026): Vetoed by Governor.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

The California Endangered Species Act requires the Fish and Game Commission to establish a list of endangered species and a list of threatened species and to add or remove species from either list if it finds, upon the receipt of sufficient scientific information, as specified, that the action is warranted. The act prohibits the taking of an endangered or threatened species, except under certain circumstances. The violation of the act is a crime.

This bill would prohibit the imposition of a civil, administrative, or criminal penalty for a violation of the take prohibition if the defendant used necessary and reasonable force to protect themselves, a member of their family, or any other individual from immediate bodily harm from a species listed pursuant to the act. The bill would require a person who committed a take, or an attempted take, of a species listed pursuant to the act under these circumstances to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife within 24 hours after the take. Because a violation of this requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 4

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Heather HadwickPrimary sponsorRepublicanAssembly1
Megan DahleCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate1
James GallagherCo-sponsorRepublicanAssembly3
Shannon GroveCo-sponsorRepublicanSenate12

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. Vetoed by Governor.
  2. Vetoed by Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  4. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 1. Page 6316.).
  6. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 1. Page 6316.).
  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  8. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
  9. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 5548.).
  10. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1.).
  11. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  12. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page