California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 1677: Public utilities: electrical and gas corporations: return on equity.
In committee Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 1677 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 2, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Public utilities: electrical and gas corporations: return on equity. Primary sponsor: Tasha Boerner (D), John Harabedian (D). It lists 1 additional sponsor. Most recent recorded action (March 23, 2026): In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law prohibits a public utility from changing a rate or altering a classification, contract, practice, or rule that would result in a new rate, except upon a showing before the commission and a finding by the commission that the new rate is justified and the public utility notifying its customers of the rate change.
This bill would require the commission to require an electrical corporation or gas corporation proposing to change a rate, or to alter a classification, contract, practice, or rule so as to result in a new rate based directly or indirectly on its request for return on invested capital, to include in its proposal certain studies, as provided. The bill would prohibit the commission from establishing an authorized return on equity for an electrical corporation or gas corporation that exceeds the rate on long-term debt issued by the federal government by more than 400 basis points.
Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.
Because the above provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing the bill’s requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 2 · Republican 1
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tasha Boerner | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 77 |
| John Harabedian | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 41 |
| James Gallagher | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 3 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
- Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
- From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
- Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
- From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
- Referred to Com. on U. & E.
- From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.
- Read first time. To print.