Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1675: Corporation Tax Law: tax expenditures: No Tax Breaks for ICE Contractors Act of 2026.

Passed one chamber Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1675 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 2, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Corporation Tax Law: tax expenditures: No Tax Breaks for ICE Contractors Act of 2026. Primary sponsor: Alex Lee (D), Mia Bonta (D), Juan Carrillo (D), Liz Ortega (D). It lists 17 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (June 24, 2026): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law, the Corporation Tax Law, imposes taxes based upon gross income, and defines “gross income” as all income from whatever source derived, unless specifically excluded. Existing law allows various credits against the taxes imposed by that law. The Corporation Tax Law conforms to federal law in its treatment of certain exclusions and credits. Existing law provides for certain programs for free legal services for indigent persons.

This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, enact the No Tax Breaks for ICE Contractors Act of 2026, which would deny all tax credits otherwise available under the Corporation Tax Law to any taxpayer that contracts with United States Department of Homeland Security, except as provided. The bill would establish the California Immigrant Resilience Fund in the State Treasury. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, in consultation with the Department of Finance, to estimate the amount of additional revenue resulting from the provisions of the bill, notify the Controller of that amount, and require the Controller to transfer that amount to the fund. The bill would make moneys in the fund available to provide immigration-related services, including removal defense, as provided, upon appropriation by the Legislature.

This bill would include a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIIIA of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature.

This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 21

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Alex LeePrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly24
Mia BontaPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly18
Juan CarrilloPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly39
Liz OrtegaPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly20
Dawn AddisCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly30
Patrick AhrensCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly26
Damon ConnollyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly12
Sade ElhawaryCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly57
Robert GarciaCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly50
Mark GonzálezCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly54
Matt HaneyCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly17
John HarabedianCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly41
Corey JacksonCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly60
Ash KalraCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly25
Tina McKinnorCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly61
Sasha Renée PérezCo-sponsorDemocraticSenate25
James RamosCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly45
Chris RogersCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly2
Nick SchultzCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly44
José Luis SolacheCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly62
Christopher WardCo-sponsorDemocraticAssembly78

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
  3. Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 20. Page 5487.)
  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  7. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 14).
  8. Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 5030.)
  9. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
  10. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  11. Read second time and amended.
  12. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 27).

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page