California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 1624: Public Lands Protection Act.
In committee Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 1624 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on January 22, 2026. According to its official title, it concerns: Public Lands Protection Act. Primary sponsor: Rick Chavez Zbur (D). It lists 9 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (August 28, 2026): Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and of any land outside its boundaries that bears relation to its planning. Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, open space, and other purposes, as provided. For these purposes, existing law authorizes the legislative body to divide a county or city into zones, but requires that regulations adopted be uniform for each class or kind of building or use of land throughout each zone. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect.
This bill, the Public Lands Protection Act, would, upon transfer to any private or nonfederal entity of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance as open space, public land, resource conservation, or an equivalent conservation-oriented designation, immediately subject that parcel to the zoning designation and associated state and local restrictions. The bill would also, upon transfer of a parcel of land located within the state that is owned by the United States government on or after January 1, 2025, and that has not been designated in an adopted general plan or zoning ordinance at the time of transfer to any private or nonfederal entity, automatically subject that parcel to the most restrictive conservation-oriented zoning designation currently applied in the jurisdiction, by operation of law. The bill would prohibit a parcel of land governed by these provisions from being rezoned, subdivided, or granted any development entitlement that is inconsistent with a conservation-oriented zoning designation, unless certain requirements are satisfied, including that a full environmental impact report is completed in accordance with CEQA. Notwithstanding these provisions, the bill would require electric infrastructure and clean energy facilities necessary to achieve California’s climate and decarbonization goals to be deemed permitted uses in a conservation-oriented zoning designation if certain conditions are met. The bill would also exempt certain other parcels from these provisions.
This bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
This bill would make these provisions severable.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 9 · Republican 1
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick Chavez Zbur | Primary sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 51 |
| Dawn Addis | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 30 |
| Damon Connolly | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 12 |
| Robert Garcia | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 50 |
| Jeff Gonzalez | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 36 |
| Gregg Hart | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 37 |
| Gail Pellerin | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 28 |
| Sharon Quirk-Silva | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 67 |
| James Ramos | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 45 |
| Chris Rogers | Co-sponsor | Democratic | Assembly | 2 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
- In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
- Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
- From printer. May be heard in committee February 22.
- Read first time. To print.