Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1488: Self-defense.

Did not advance Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Did not advance

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1488 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 21, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Self-defense. Primary sponsor: Heath Flora (R), Phillip Chen (R). Most recent recorded action (February 2, 2026): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law authorizes a party about to be injured to lawfully resist the commission of a public offense and to use sufficient resistance to prevent the offense. Existing case law provides that, in order to justify an act of self-defense, an individual must have a reasonable belief that the threat is imminent, and limits the right of self-defense to the use of that force that is reasonable under the circumstances.

This bill, the Preemptive Self Defense Act of 2025, would clarify that a party who reasonably perceives an imminent threat of bodily harm may make lawful resistance to the commission of a public offense and that the resistance authorized is required to be proportional to the reasonably perceived threat and to cease when the threat is no longer present. The bill would prohibit a party’s background, training, and professional fighting skills from being taken into account when determining whether a party has taken reasonable defensive action.

Existing law authorizes necessary force to be used to protect from wrongful injury the person or property of oneself, or of a spouse, child, parent, or other relative, or member of one’s family, or of a ward, servant, master, or guest.

This bill would also specify that there shall not be any civil liability on the part of, and no cause of action shall accrue against, a person who lawfully resists a public offense, as described above.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 2

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Heath FloraPrimary sponsorRepublicanAssembly9
Phillip ChenPrimary sponsorRepublicanAssembly59

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
  3. In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  4. In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  6. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
  7. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
  8. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
  9. Read first time.
  10. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
  11. Introduced. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page