Skip to main content
Independent and nonpartisan. SaveYourState is a civic information resource. It is not a government website and is not affiliated with any government agency, party, or campaign.

California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill

AB 1379: Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program.

Did not advance Official data

  1. Introduced
  2. In committee
  3. Passed one chamber
  4. Passed both chambers
  5. Enacted
  6. Did not advance

Last official action: ·Record last updated:

Plain-language summary

AB 1379 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 21, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Vehicles: speed safety system pilot program. Primary sponsor: Stephanie Nguyen (D). Most recent recorded action (February 2, 2026): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written

Official summary

Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.

Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2032, the Cities of Los Angeles, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale, and Long Beach, and the City and County of San Francisco to establish a speed safety system pilot program if the system meets specified requirements. Existing law requires a participating city or city and county to adopt a Speed Safety System Use Policy and a Speed Safety System Impact Report before implementing the program, and requires the participating city or city and county to engage in a public information campaign at least 30 days before implementation of the program, including information relating to when the systems would begin detecting violations and where the systems would be utilized.

This bill would expand the list of cities authorized to establish a speed safety system pilot program as described above to include the City of Sacramento.

This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the City of Sacramento.

Sponsors

Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Democratic 1

NameRolePartyChamberDistrict
Stephanie NguyenPrimary sponsorDemocraticAssembly10

“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.

Recent official actions

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
  3. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
  5. Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P. & C.P.
  6. Read first time.
  7. From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
  8. Introduced. To print.

Sources

  1. California Legislative Information — pubinfo database export
  2. Official bill page