California · 2025–26 Regular Session · Assembly Bill
AB 1226: Air quality: wildland vegetation management burning: permits: exemption.
Did not advance Official data
- Introduced
- In committee
- Passed one chamber
- Passed both chambers
- Enacted
- Did not advance
Last official action: ·Record last updated:
Plain-language summary
AB 1226 is a assembly bill introduced in the California Assembly on February 21, 2025. According to its official title, it concerns: Air quality: wildland vegetation management burning: permits: exemption. Primary sponsor: Stan Ellis (R). It lists 8 additional sponsors. Most recent recorded action (February 2, 2026): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Generated automatically from the official title, sponsor list, and status record only. It does not characterize the bill’s purpose or effects. How summaries are written
Official summary
Legislative Counsel’s Digest (official, as of the latest version). Written by nonpartisan legislative staff; reproduced verbatim.
Existing law authorizes the State Air Resources Board to designate public fire protection agencies or other equivalent agencies to issue permits, subject to the rules and regulations of the state board, for agricultural burning, which includes wildland vegetation management burning, as specified.
This bill would revise those provisions to also require the state board to designate those agencies to oversee agricultural burning activities and to adopt rules and regulations to ensure those activities are conducted safely and effectively. The bill would exempt wildland vegetation management burning from the above-described permit requirement if that activity is conducted by, or under the supervision of, the applicable agency designated by the state board. The bill would require the state board to develop guidelines and best practices for wildland vegetation management burning to ensure public safety and environmental protection.
By expanding the duties of local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Sponsors
Sponsors by party (alphabetical): Republican 9
| Name | Role | Party | Chamber | District |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Ellis | Primary sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 32 |
| Juan Alanis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 22 |
| Leticia Castillo | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 58 |
| Laurie Davies | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 74 |
| Carl DeMaio | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 75 |
| Heath Flora | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 9 |
| James Gallagher | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 3 |
| Kate Sanchez | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 71 |
| Greg Wallis | Co-sponsor | Republican | Assembly | 47 |
“Support” is shown only as formal sponsorship recorded by the legislature. Roll-call votes are available on the official bill page.
Recent official actions
- From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
- Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
- Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
- From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
- Assembly Rule 47.1 invoked. (Ellis).
- Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
- Read first time.
- From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
- Introduced. To print.